I
don't really understand why so many people were against it. I know
there's been a lot of arguing about the environmental cost - but surely
it actually brings some environmental benefits? I mean, don't you
think it's better that summer visitors can't gain easy access to the
extremely sensitive plateau of Cairn Gorm, as did thousands of passengers
on the old White Lady chairlift? Surely the environmentalists who
are so violently opposed to the funicular should be pleased that no
further damage can be caused to the plateau? Yet this doesn't seem
to be the case - I just don't get it.
Anyway,
I think it is fantastic that the funicular has boosted visitor numbers.
You see, this area is heavily dependent on tourism. Tourism provides
41% of employment in the Cairngorms and the area has major significance
as part of Scotland's tourist appeal. In a good ski season £12 million
can be spent in the area, with a third of that being expenditure
on the slopes and two thirds being spent on accommodation, catering,
clothing etc.
|
Tourists
need somewhere to stay.

©
Pauline Park
|